Oasis Security vs Astrix for NHI Lifecycle and OAuth Governance
Choose Oasis when the painful week is NHI lifecycle and ownership: inventory, assign owners, rotate, decommission, and issue short-lived agentic access sessions. Choose Astrix (Cisco) when the painful week is OAuth and SaaS app-to-app NHI governance: discover connected apps, score standing grants, and remediate on the Cisco Identity Intelligence path.
A lead asks a useful question before the RFP: is the open Monday ticket “who owns this service account, and can we rotate or retire it before Friday,” or “which OAuth apps still hold standing grants into Salesforce and the rest of SaaS?” Both land under non-human identity language. They do not hire the same operator.
Between these two, Oasis Security productizes NHI lifecycle and ownership plus Agentic Access Management: inventory across cloud and SaaS, ownership campaigns, posture, Scout anomaly detection, and short-lived least-privilege sessions for agent actions. Astrix Security productizes Discover-Secure-Deploy for OAuth apps, third-party integrations, service accounts, API keys, AI agents, and MCP servers on the Cisco Identity Intelligence path after the June 2026 close. Oasis still sees SaaS NHIs. Astrix still remediates risk. The centers still differ.
Aembit versus Astrix is the workload IAM fork. Astrix versus Entro is the secrets-lineage fork. For the wider shortlist, see non-human identity tools and Compare.
| Job | NHI lifecycle, ownership, posture, and Agentic Access Management sessions | OAuth / SaaS / third-party app-to-app NHI Discover-Secure-Deploy (Cisco path) |
|---|---|---|
| How a bad day closes | Owner assigned, credential rotated or decommissioned, agent session torn down after the task | Risky OAuth grant or connected app revoked; Identity Graph shows blast radius |
| Operator morning unit | Orphaned NHIs, ownership gaps, lifecycle queues, AAM policy decisions | OAuth apps, third-party integrations, agent/MCP inventory, access anomalies |
| Deploy | Agentless connectors across cloud, SaaS, vaults, on-prem identity; AAM in the agent access path | Agentless non-proxy API / metadata connectors; evaluate via Cisco after 30 Jun 2026 |
| License/pricing | Sales-quoted; no public dollar SKU (checked 13 Sep 2026); Cyera LOI announced 28 Jul 2026 | New standalone licenses ended 30 Jun 2026; evaluate via Cisco; no public self-serve dollar table |
| Who operates it | Identity / IAM teams owning NHI lifecycle and agentic access policy | Identity / AppSec / SaaS-TPRM on the Cisco identity stack |
That naming fight is why “NHI platform” RFPs still mix lifecycle ownership with OAuth governance. Oasis hires the ownership and session desk. Astrix hires the connected-app desk.
We reviewed first-party documentation, pricing and plans pages, product announcements, and live community threads. We did not test the products in paid production environments, so this is not a hands-on benchmark. This page does not include exploit proofs of concept.
Oasis Security

Astrix Security

Editions and pricing
Neither product publishes a self-serve dollar table on first-party pages checked 13 Sep 2026. Ownership math still matters: Oasis sits under a Cyera letter of intent from 28 July 2026 while oasis.security remains the product site. Astrix folded into Cisco after the June 2026 close, with standalone new-license sales ended 30 June 2026.
| How you buy it now | Demo / sales on oasis.security; treat invoice parent as in motion after the Cyera LOI | Evaluate and renew through Cisco Identity Intelligence / Duo / Secure Access packaging |
|---|---|---|
| Public units | No public dollar SKU (checked 13 Sep 2026) | No public self-serve dollar table; existing customers keep current agreements per Cisco banner |
| What the invoice covers | NHI Security Cloud modules plus Agentic Access Management scoped in the quote | NHI / agent Discover-Secure-Deploy capabilities as Cisco product lines |
| 2026 ownership signal | Cyera LOI ~$1B (28 Jul 2026); expected integration into identity + data security | Cisco intent-to-acquire announcement; Astrix site: new standalone licenses ended 30 Jun 2026 |
Ask procurement who invoices after close, and whether the quote is for lifecycle/AAM depth or for OAuth/SaaS NHI governance on Cisco.
NHI lifecycle and ownership
| Primary surface | Inventory, ownership campaigns, posture ranking, Scout ITDR, provision/rotate/decommission workflows | NHI inventory exists, but the marketed center is Discover-Secure-Deploy for access grants and agents, not ownership campaigns as the brand |
|---|---|---|
| Agent access model | Oasis AAM turns agent actions into short-lived least-privilege sessions with intent-to-audit trails | Agent Control Plane and Identity Graph for agent/MCP inventory and scoped credentials on the Cisco path |
| Standing privilege problem | Designed to remove long-lived agent grants by issuing ephemeral identities per approved intent | Stronger on finding and remediating broad OAuth/app grants already issued into SaaS |
| What teams argue about | Whether identity can own NHI lifecycle end-to-end without a separate secrets scanner | Whether Cisco packaging replaces a standalone NHI lifecycle program |
That long-lived token complaint is the Oasis Monday: ownership, rotation, decommission, and AAM sessions that do not leave standing God-mode grants behind. Between these two, buy Oasis when that lifecycle desk is the product.
OAuth and SaaS NHI governance
| Primary surface | SaaS and cloud NHIs appear in inventory and ownership; product center is lifecycle + AAM, not OAuth app-to-app as the brand | OAuth apps, third-party integrations, connected apps, API keys, AI agents, MCP servers with Identity Graph risk and revoke |
|---|---|---|
| Remediation shape | Owner certification, rotation, decommission, policy on agent sessions | Rotate or revoke grants; reduce scope; block risky app-to-app paths before action |
| Cisco path | Independent brand under Cyera LOI; not a Cisco Identity Intelligence module | Folding into Cisco Identity Intelligence / Duo / Secure Access / Splunk path |
| What teams argue about | Whether AAM replaces OAuth governance for citizen-built agents | Whether Discover-Secure-Deploy closes orphaned service-account ownership tickets |
That connected-app path is why Astrix still wins committees that wake up to OAuth and SaaS third-party grants. Between these two, buy Astrix when that governance desk is the product.
Where they overlap
Both speak NHI and AI-agent language. Both inventory machine identities across cloud and SaaS classes. Both sell remediation rather than a spreadsheet. Overlap is vocabulary and discovery adjacency, not identical weekly work. Treating them as one interchangeable NHI invoice usually under-funds either ownership/lifecycle/AAM or OAuth/SaaS app-to-app governance.
When to use both
Running both can work when jobs stay separate: Oasis for NHI ownership, lifecycle, and AAM sessions; Astrix on Cisco for OAuth and SaaS app-to-app governance. Keep ticket queues split so one backlog does not pretend to close the other.
Skip Oasis for this pair if the open pain is connected-app and OAuth grant governance inside a Cisco identity stack. Skip Astrix for this pair if the open pain is orphaned service accounts, rotation campaigns, and intent-scoped agent sessions.
Decide the weekly queue first. If the product must own NHI lifecycle and Agentic Access Management, that is Oasis. If the product must govern OAuth and SaaS NHI access on Cisco, that is Astrix. Only then book the demos.
FAQs
Are Oasis and Astrix the same NHI product?
No. Between these two, Oasis leads with lifecycle, ownership, and AAM sessions. Astrix leads with OAuth and SaaS app-to-app Discover-Secure-Deploy on the Cisco path. Both use NHI language; the centers differ.
How is this different from Aembit vs Astrix or Astrix vs Entro?
Aembit versus Astrix is workload IAM and secretless JIT access versus Astrix SaaS NHI governance. Astrix versus Entro is OAuth/SaaS governance versus secrets sprawl and credential lineage. This comparison covers lifecycle, ownership, and AAM versus OAuth and SaaS NHI governance.
What public prices should buyers note?
As of 13 Sep 2026, neither publishes a self-serve dollar SKU on first-party pages. Ask who invoices after the Cyera LOI (Oasis) and after the Cisco close (Astrix).
Does this page include exploit how-tos?
No. SecureCoding compare pages do not publish exploit proofs of concept or attack construction steps.
Is this a scored bake-off?
No. Order is editorial.