A Security vs Pentera: autonomous attack campaigns or a modular validation platform
A Security’s offensive and defensive agents that plan, chain, exploit, remediate, and retest, beside Pentera Core, Surface, Cloud, and Resolve for internal, external, and cloud validation with remediation orchestration.
A point-in-time pentest goes stale as soon as the environment changes. Pentera has sold that argument for years with automated testing that runs whenever the team wants it. A Security, out of stealth since June 2026, pushes it further with agents that run campaigns continuously, then drive the fix and retest it.
Both validate exploitability rather than score theoretical risk, and both retest after remediation. Pentera splits the work into products: Core for internal networks, Surface for external, Cloud for cloud identity and hybrid environments, and Resolve for remediation orchestration, with web app and API testing and threat-led testing as AI-native use cases. A Security describes one closed loop that finds exposure, proves exploitability, chains attack paths across web, AI, network, and infrastructure, remediates at the source and in compensating controls, and validates closure. A Security’s capabilities are launch claims, stated rather than independently demonstrated.
Buy A Security when you want one continuous campaign across web, AI, network, and infrastructure that chains findings and drives remediation through ITSM until closure is proven. Buy Pentera when you want established, separately licensed validation for internal, external, and cloud attack surfaces with documented safety controls and audit proof.
Overview
| Primary use case | Autonomous offensive security and remediation across applications, identities, and infrastructure | Exposure and security validation across internal networks, external attack surface, cloud, and web apps, with remediation orchestration |
|---|---|---|
| Day-to-day workflow | Review and approve a prioritized attack plan, watch the validated kill chain live, then track fixes through ITSM until retests close them | Schedule or run validation tests per product, review exploitable findings and attack paths, push remediation through Resolve, and retest |
| Main buying consideration | No public pricing. Sold by demo | AWS Marketplace lists a 12-month Pentera contract at USD 120,000, with units and module scope set in a private offer |
We reviewed A Security’s homepage, its launch blog, and its June 2026 launch announcement, plus Pentera’s homepage, product navigation, Pentera Cloud page, remote testing datasheet, and AWS Marketplace listing, on 14 Oct 2026. We did not run either product.
A Security

Pentera

Editions and pricing
Pentera licenses by product and attack surface. A Security sells a single platform and publishes no packaging.
| How it is sold | One offensive security and remediation platform | Pentera Core, Surface, Cloud, and Resolve, plus SECTOR11 adversarial testing and Security Validation Advisory services |
|---|---|---|
| Services | Not confirmed in public documentation | SECTOR11 experts test environments for customers. Security Validation Advisory guides the program |
| Deployment | Delivered as a service. Detailed requirements are not confirmed in public documentation | Core runs agentless from an on-premises install or a private cloud instance connected by VPN. Surface tests from outside the perimeter. Cloud tests AWS and Azure IaaS in production under scoped permissions and impact limits |
How testing runs
Both emulate real attackers in production. The control model before a test starts is where they differ in public documentation.
| Test planning | Builds a prioritized attack plan toward the most valuable assets, which the team reviews and approves before anything runs | Tests configured per product: internal network, external network, cloud, and web application |
|---|---|---|
| Attack chaining | Links exploits into a validated kill chain across domains and shows it move by move, live | Attack paths and exploitable findings per environment, including credential and Active Directory exposure |
| Safety and audit | Every move, exploit, and line of code is logged and visible | Controlled execution with audit proof on the Safety and Compliance page |
Remediation and retest
Both close the loop with a retest. A Security says its agents also make the fix.
| Who fixes | Drives fixes at the source and adjusts compensating controls, with ticket-ready records | Pentera Resolve orchestrates remediation through existing workflows |
|---|---|---|
| Ticketing | Integrates into ITSM and closes the loop automatically after retest | Remediation orchestration with integrations into the security ecosystem |
| Retest | Re-tests until closure is proven | Re-assessment after mitigations to validate the fix |
Choose A Security when you want a single agent-run campaign that crosses web, AI, network, and infrastructure, with plan approval up front and remediation pushed through ITSM until retests close it. Choose Pentera when you want validation licensed by attack surface, a Marketplace contract path, documented safety controls, and expert testing services from the same vendor.
FAQs
Does A Security run attacks without approval?
A Security says it builds a prioritized attack plan that the team reviews and approves before anything runs.
What does Pentera Resolve do?
It orchestrates remediation of validated findings through the team’s existing workflows.
Is there a related comparison?
Yes. See Pentera vs SafeBreach for Pentera against breach and attack simulation.